<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gardy vs The Leadoff Spot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firegardy.com/2008/03/08/gardy-vs-the-leadoff-spot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firegardy.com/2008/03/08/gardy-vs-the-leadoff-spot/</link>
	<description>Mismanaging games since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sirsean</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2008/03/08/gardy-vs-the-leadoff-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>sirsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2008/03/08/gardy-vs-the-leadoff-spot/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s the opposite of Gardy&#039;s former policy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What it &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; be is that Gardenhire knows this is a rebuilding year; Terry Ryan would never have allowed that. His philosophy was that the team should slowly improve each year, always marginally competitive, and never taking a significant drop off to rebuild. Wild Bill looks to be turning that around, preparing to take a shot in the next few years.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If Gardy does give consistent at bats to Gomez ... he&#039;d better give them to Kubel as well. The way I see it, if Gomez and Span would be hurt by a platoon, why wouldn&#039;t Kubel? Or Buscher?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think if Wild Bill were behind this, there&#039;d be some consistency. We&#039;ll see what happens, I suppose. But I don&#039;t have much faith.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the opposite of Gardy&#8217;s former policy.</p>

<p>What it <i>might</i> be is that Gardenhire knows this is a rebuilding year; Terry Ryan would never have allowed that. His philosophy was that the team should slowly improve each year, always marginally competitive, and never taking a significant drop off to rebuild. Wild Bill looks to be turning that around, preparing to take a shot in the next few years.</p>

<p>If Gardy does give consistent at bats to Gomez &#8230; he&#8217;d better give them to Kubel as well. The way I see it, if Gomez and Span would be hurt by a platoon, why wouldn&#8217;t Kubel? Or Buscher?</p>

<p>I think if Wild Bill were behind this, there&#8217;d be some consistency. We&#8217;ll see what happens, I suppose. But I don&#8217;t have much faith.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunBobby</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2008/03/08/gardy-vs-the-leadoff-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>FunBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2008/03/08/gardy-vs-the-leadoff-spot/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That seems terribly inconsistent with the previous policy of not rushing young players and not really allowing them to learn on the job.  Maybe its a Wild Bill thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems terribly inconsistent with the previous policy of not rushing young players and not really allowing them to learn on the job.  Maybe its a Wild Bill thing.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.818 seconds -->
