<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twins-Sox series preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firegardy.com/2008/09/23/twins-sox-series-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firegardy.com/2008/09/23/twins-sox-series-preview/</link>
	<description>Mismanaging games since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FunBobby</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2008/09/23/twins-sox-series-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1081</link>
		<dc:creator>FunBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=157#comment-1081</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I really hope gardy doesn&#039;t instill in these guys that a sweep isn&#039;t necessary. I feel if they are told they don&#039;t absolutely need to win a game, the get that &quot;we&#039;ll get them tomorrow attitude&quot;, which is not the killer instinct we need at this time of year.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope gardy doesn&#8217;t instill in these guys that a sweep isn&#8217;t necessary. I feel if they are told they don&#8217;t absolutely need to win a game, the get that &#8220;we&#8217;ll get them tomorrow attitude&#8221;, which is not the killer instinct we need at this time of year.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirsean</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2008/09/23/twins-sox-series-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>sirsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=157#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While a sweep is obviously the most desirable outcome, I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll be completely sunk if we only take 2 of 3.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We&#039;d be 1.5 back, meaning we&#039;d have to sweep KC at home, and hope the Sox don&#039;t sweep the Indians -- and the Indians have been playing really well lately. If we take 2 of 3 from the Sox then sweep KC, and the Sox take 2 of 3 from the Indians, then the Sox have to play Detroit and if they lose, we get to play them in a one game playoff.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s not a desirable solution at all, but it&#039;s at least possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While a sweep is obviously the most desirable outcome, I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll be completely sunk if we only take 2 of 3.</p>

<p>We&#8217;d be 1.5 back, meaning we&#8217;d have to sweep KC at home, and hope the Sox don&#8217;t sweep the Indians &#8212; and the Indians have been playing really well lately. If we take 2 of 3 from the Sox then sweep KC, and the Sox take 2 of 3 from the Indians, then the Sox have to play Detroit and if they lose, we get to play them in a one game playoff.</p>

<p>That&#8217;s not a desirable solution at all, but it&#8217;s at least possible.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.814 seconds -->

