<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Thome?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/</link>
	<description>Mismanaging games since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:52:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FunBobby</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>FunBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Given the price they are paying for Thome, I think it is OK if he is used sparingly off the bench.  If we were going to pay him 3-4 mil, I think it would have been necessary for him to play more to justify the price tag.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the price they are paying for Thome, I think it is OK if he is used sparingly off the bench.  If we were going to pay him 3-4 mil, I think it would have been necessary for him to play more to justify the price tag.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragstoriches</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragstoriches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sometimes I just don&#039;t understand the Twins man.  I guess the Thome deal is low-risk, and maybe they thought the move would impress Mauer.  But something tells me they&#039;re done for the offseason.  Which makes about 15 straight years they&#039;ve failed to address the 2B/3B issue.  But hey, let&#039;s add a creaky left handed DH.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So are they giving up on Delmontello?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I just don&#8217;t understand the Twins man.  I guess the Thome deal is low-risk, and maybe they thought the move would impress Mauer.  But something tells me they&#8217;re done for the offseason.  Which makes about 15 straight years they&#8217;ve failed to address the 2B/3B issue.  But hey, let&#8217;s add a creaky left handed DH.  </p>

<p>So are they giving up on Delmontello?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirsean</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3284</link>
		<dc:creator>sirsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3284</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it was a Twins scout that said he had bad defense, and yes, we know they don&#039;t look at defensive metrics. We also know they don&#039;t know/care about OBP.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If they don&#039;t go after Lopez it&#039;s not necessarily about money (we don&#039;t know what the market for him is right now, and actually I&#039;m stunned he&#039;s still out there).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It may very well be that &lt;em&gt;the Twins don&#039;t think he&#039;s any good&lt;/em&gt;. They&#039;d be &lt;em&gt;wrong&lt;/em&gt; about that, but that seems to be what they think.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it was a Twins scout that said he had bad defense, and yes, we know they don&#8217;t look at defensive metrics. We also know they don&#8217;t know/care about OBP.</p>

<p>If they don&#8217;t go after Lopez it&#8217;s not necessarily about money (we don&#8217;t know what the market for him is right now, and actually I&#8217;m stunned he&#8217;s still out there).</p>

<p>It may very well be that <em>the Twins don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s any good</em>. They&#8217;d be <em>wrong</em> about that, but that seems to be what they think.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rghrbek</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>rghrbek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;LEN3 cited one scout, who was probably a Twins scout and we know how much the Twins use metrics to value a player.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not often to never.  In all my research (meaning whatever I can remember reading since I wanted him at the trading deadline last year til now) is that he is a better than average 2nd basemen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, .383 ob% last year.  If the Twins don&#039;t go after Lopez it&#039;s because of money, not his glove.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEN3 cited one scout, who was probably a Twins scout and we know how much the Twins use metrics to value a player.</p>

<p>Not often to never.  In all my research (meaning whatever I can remember reading since I wanted him at the trading deadline last year til now) is that he is a better than average 2nd basemen.</p>

<p>Oh yeah, .383 ob% last year.  If the Twins don&#8217;t go after Lopez it&#8217;s because of money, not his glove.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirsean</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>sirsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Undoubtedly, they&#039;ve considered both as options. According to LEN3, the scouts are convinced that Lopez&#039;s 2B defense is bad (they disagree with UZR) and thus the Twins aren&#039;t chasing after him very hard. I don&#039;t know the status of their pursuit of Hudson.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So really, we&#039;re just hoping the Twins are smart enough to think a Punto/Tolbert/Casilla &quot;super platoon&quot; isn&#039;t adequate for 2B. I have a feeling it&#039;s false hope.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undoubtedly, they&#8217;ve considered both as options. According to LEN3, the scouts are convinced that Lopez&#8217;s 2B defense is bad (they disagree with UZR) and thus the Twins aren&#8217;t chasing after him very hard. I don&#8217;t know the status of their pursuit of Hudson.</p>

<p>So really, we&#8217;re just hoping the Twins are smart enough to think a Punto/Tolbert/Casilla &#8220;super platoon&#8221; isn&#8217;t adequate for 2B. I have a feeling it&#8217;s false hope.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragstoriches</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragstoriches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are the Twins officially pursuing Lopez and/or Hudson?  Any other teams in the running?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the Twins officially pursuing Lopez and/or Hudson?  Any other teams in the running?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirsean</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>sirsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh my god, do I hope the Twins don&#039;t go over $100M by signing Washburn and Thome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I totally agree that a #2 hitter like Lopez should be a much higher priority, and if we get him our lineup&#039;s main weakness is going to be Delmon Young and whoever&#039;s playing 3B (unless Valencia turns out to be any good). I&#039;d say that&#039;s a contender&#039;s problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But $4M isn&#039;t totally over the wall for Thome. Assuming Gleeman&#039;s analysis is accurate, which I do, and that Thome gets considerable playing time (350-400 plate appearances), he&#039;ll be worth 1 win. This offseason, wins seem to be going for $3.5M-$4M on the free agent market. If we could get Thome on a $2M deal, then he&#039;s worth it as a bench player (though the cut in versatility will still hurt, and I don&#039;t know what that&#039;s worth). The thing is, we don&#039;t really know what kind of dollars they&#039;re talking about; we only know that $4M is the absolute maximum the Twins should pay him based on how good he is and the maximum amount of playing time they&#039;re going to give him. And at that rate he wouldn&#039;t be a &lt;em&gt;bad&lt;/em&gt; deal.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god, do I hope the Twins don&#8217;t go over $100M by signing Washburn and Thome.</p>

<p>I totally agree that a #2 hitter like Lopez should be a much higher priority, and if we get him our lineup&#8217;s main weakness is going to be Delmon Young and whoever&#8217;s playing 3B (unless Valencia turns out to be any good). I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s a contender&#8217;s problem.</p>

<p>But $4M isn&#8217;t totally over the wall for Thome. Assuming Gleeman&#8217;s analysis is accurate, which I do, and that Thome gets considerable playing time (350-400 plate appearances), he&#8217;ll be worth 1 win. This offseason, wins seem to be going for $3.5M-$4M on the free agent market. If we could get Thome on a $2M deal, then he&#8217;s worth it as a bench player (though the cut in versatility will still hurt, and I don&#8217;t know what that&#8217;s worth). The thing is, we don&#8217;t really know what kind of dollars they&#8217;re talking about; we only know that $4M is the absolute maximum the Twins should pay him based on how good he is and the maximum amount of playing time they&#8217;re going to give him. And at that rate he wouldn&#8217;t be a <em>bad</em> deal.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rghrbek</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>rghrbek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lots of good dialogue on here.  As opposed as I am to this move (who cares what I think?), you know Gardy will find a way to work him (big Jim) in more (it&#039;s rumored by fat Pat, that Gardy is the one pushing this).  I would not be surprised to see him play a little 1st base, so he can give Morny a break and DH more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As &quot;over the baggy&quot; pointed out, his skills are diminishing, even his hitting skills against righties.  Yes, if we get Lopez or another quality infield option, and somehow sign big Jim, then I won&#039;t be as opposed due to the possible &quot;bench presence&quot; he may have. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anything close to 4 million for this guy is ludicrous.  We have other needs more pressing.  Playing Kubel in the field that much, makes one of the most challenged outfields in all of baseball worse.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the Twins were (hypothetical here) to get a legit #2 guy in the batting order, their lineup would be quite formidable.  In this scenario, adding Thome, at that kind of price, is silly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My gut tells me, they will sign big jim and Jarod W, and call it an off-season (maybe going after Crede), crossing their fingers that Joe will be impressed and give us that home town discount.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of good dialogue on here.  As opposed as I am to this move (who cares what I think?), you know Gardy will find a way to work him (big Jim) in more (it&#8217;s rumored by fat Pat, that Gardy is the one pushing this).  I would not be surprised to see him play a little 1st base, so he can give Morny a break and DH more.</p>

<p>As &#8220;over the baggy&#8221; pointed out, his skills are diminishing, even his hitting skills against righties.  Yes, if we get Lopez or another quality infield option, and somehow sign big Jim, then I won&#8217;t be as opposed due to the possible &#8220;bench presence&#8221; he may have. </p>

<p>Anything close to 4 million for this guy is ludicrous.  We have other needs more pressing.  Playing Kubel in the field that much, makes one of the most challenged outfields in all of baseball worse.  </p>

<p>If the Twins were (hypothetical here) to get a legit #2 guy in the batting order, their lineup would be quite formidable.  In this scenario, adding Thome, at that kind of price, is silly.</p>

<p>My gut tells me, they will sign big jim and Jarod W, and call it an off-season (maybe going after Crede), crossing their fingers that Joe will be impressed and give us that home town discount.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirsean</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>sirsean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But at the price of $4M, you&#039;re suddenly not acting like a mid-market team. Having a one-trick pony like Thome as nothing but a bench player is a luxury the Twins likely can&#039;t afford, and given the number of plate appearances he&#039;d get as a bench player, we&#039;d be paying a premium per win; giving him regular DH-duty against righties is about the only way to get that investment to pay off.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If we&#039;re in &quot;develop young players&quot; mode, then no, we don&#039;t want to platoon Delmon Young. But if we&#039;re in &quot;win now&quot; mode, and platooning him with Thome will make us a better team for this year, then it&#039;s not clueless. It&#039;s just a decision.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But at the price of $4M, you&#8217;re suddenly not acting like a mid-market team. Having a one-trick pony like Thome as nothing but a bench player is a luxury the Twins likely can&#8217;t afford, and given the number of plate appearances he&#8217;d get as a bench player, we&#8217;d be paying a premium per win; giving him regular DH-duty against righties is about the only way to get that investment to pay off.</p>

<p>If we&#8217;re in &#8220;develop young players&#8221; mode, then no, we don&#8217;t want to platoon Delmon Young. But if we&#8217;re in &#8220;win now&#8221; mode, and platooning him with Thome will make us a better team for this year, then it&#8217;s not clueless. It&#8217;s just a decision.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/01/25/jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/?p=935#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;what, exactly, is so “clueless” about platooning a righty-killing slugger with a young player who struggles against righties?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Only a clueless organization signs a 40 year old aging slugger for the expressed purpose of taking plate appearances away from a young player they just committed a starting spot to. Especially when they have an enormous investment in him  and he appeared to have broken out at the end of last season. And you are not only messing with Young, but with Kubel as well. Its a trading card plan.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;if we ever used him we’d also have to burn Pridie or Tolbert as a defensive replacement. &quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t one purpose of having defensive players like Pridie and Tolbert (or Cassila) on the bench to allow you to pinch hit for someone? Why would using them in that role be a problem? Unless he hits a home run, you are also probably going to pinch run for Thome, which those guys can do as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why would Thome be a worse option as the last bench player than Alexi Casilla or Matt Tolbert? He can pinch hit for Harris and Punto.  As the idea of platooning him with Young demonstrates, it allows you to use Kubel as an offensive fourth outfielder. Which means if Morneau, Cuddyer or Young get hurt you are not limited to Pridie as your only backup. It seems like he brings a lot more to the table than another utility infielder.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what, exactly, is so “clueless” about platooning a righty-killing slugger with a young player who struggles against righties?&#8221;</p>

<p>Only a clueless organization signs a 40 year old aging slugger for the expressed purpose of taking plate appearances away from a young player they just committed a starting spot to. Especially when they have an enormous investment in him  and he appeared to have broken out at the end of last season. And you are not only messing with Young, but with Kubel as well. Its a trading card plan.</p>

<p>&#8220;if we ever used him we’d also have to burn Pridie or Tolbert as a defensive replacement. &#8221; </p>

<p>Isn&#8217;t one purpose of having defensive players like Pridie and Tolbert (or Cassila) on the bench to allow you to pinch hit for someone? Why would using them in that role be a problem? Unless he hits a home run, you are also probably going to pinch run for Thome, which those guys can do as well.</p>

<p>Why would Thome be a worse option as the last bench player than Alexi Casilla or Matt Tolbert? He can pinch hit for Harris and Punto.  As the idea of platooning him with Young demonstrates, it allows you to use Kubel as an offensive fourth outfielder. Which means if Morneau, Cuddyer or Young get hurt you are not limited to Pridie as your only backup. It seems like he brings a lot more to the table than another utility infielder.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.234 seconds -->

