<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We might be back to Wild Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/</link>
	<description>Mismanaging games since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:37:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rghrbek</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3399</link>
		<dc:creator>rghrbek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/#comment-3399</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The rotation has a chance of being one of the best in baseball?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe... upon further reflection.  We do play in the AL Central.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If Liriano reverts back to 2006 form, yes, immediately we are that good.  Realistically, though might be better than last year and that makes our rotation solid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Still, hasn&#039;t Pavano only been healthy for 1 of the last 6 years?  He is an unknown, similar to Liriano, for different reasons.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regardless, it&#039;s been a good off season.  One in which, we, as Twins fans, are not accustomed too!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rotation has a chance of being one of the best in baseball?</p>

<p>Maybe&#8230; upon further reflection.  We do play in the AL Central.</p>

<p>If Liriano reverts back to 2006 form, yes, immediately we are that good.  Realistically, though might be better than last year and that makes our rotation solid.</p>

<p>Still, hasn&#8217;t Pavano only been healthy for 1 of the last 6 years?  He is an unknown, similar to Liriano, for different reasons.</p>

<p>Regardless, it&#8217;s been a good off season.  One in which, we, as Twins fans, are not accustomed too!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3397</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/#comment-3397</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Bitch Sox is how Bat Girl normally referred to Chicago.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For me the Red Sox are Evil Empire II (Evil Empire I Being the Yankees)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bitch Sox is how Bat Girl normally referred to Chicago.  </p>

<p>For me the Red Sox are Evil Empire II (Evil Empire I Being the Yankees)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunBobby</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>FunBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Which Sox are the &quot;bitch sox&quot;? Or is that a phrase to describe both of them?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Sox are the &#8220;bitch sox&#8221;? Or is that a phrase to describe both of them?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Vikings done. Wolves irrelevant. MN transplant from CA so hockey not a big deal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bring on baseball!  Can&#039;t wait for the lads to take on the Bitch Sox.  (If only Bat Girl was still blogging this would be perfect!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vikings done. Wolves irrelevant. MN transplant from CA so hockey not a big deal.</p>

<p>Bring on baseball!  Can&#8217;t wait for the lads to take on the Bitch Sox.  (If only Bat Girl was still blogging this would be perfect!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FunBobby</title>
		<link>http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-3392</link>
		<dc:creator>FunBobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firegardy.com/2010/02/05/we-might-be-back-to-wild-bill/#comment-3392</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope he doesn&#039;t make a habit of making a bunch of moves in one season, then doing nothing for 2 or 3.  but it is great to see him addressing needs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he doesn&#8217;t make a habit of making a bunch of moves in one season, then doing nothing for 2 or 3.  but it is great to see him addressing needs.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.643 seconds -->

